Saturday, April 25, 2015

Architecture and Fashion



Architecture and Fashion



After looking at a series of photos famous historic buildings, I realize that architecture is like fashion design.  The works are temporary and temporal.  We think of buildings as being solid like mountains, or sculptures, but they are mostly empty air, and structurally delicate; being precariously balanced on a foundation.  Compared to other fine arts, buildings have a short life that is akin to the fabric arts.  Many new architectural styles actually consist of walls and an exterior that is hung from, or draped over, a solid structural skeleton, similar to fashion design.  Architectural styles change as frequently as fashion and the two are frequently related.



copyright(c)2015
William Schaeffer

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Math Day April 27

Math Day April 27


April 27 =  4 - 27

4  =  2 squared = 2 * 2

27 = 3 cubed    = 3 * 3 * 3


Celebrate the joys of Mathematics, arithmetic, counting, and multiplying on

Math Day April 27



copyright(c)2015
William Schaeffer

Saturday, April 18, 2015

Mad Cow disease



"No one ever got Mad Cow disease from eating nuts and berries." - Mr. Atwater





copyright(c)2015
William Schaffer

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Book Review, "Consciousness - A Very Short Introduction" by Susan Blackmore



Consciousness – A Very Short Introduction
By Susan Blackmore

A fascinating read that summarizes concepts about one of the great mysteries of life: Human Consciousness, or The Conscious Experience.

One attraction of the book is that it is short; comprising less than 150 pages.  For no matter how deep or penetrating an idea, we know that it has to end in a reasonable time.  The author has an easy facility with language and the text is well written.

After analyzing ideas, the author draws some conclusions.  There are two memorable ideas in this book:

1)” Mind is what the brain does.”  There is no separate conscious entity like “The soul”, “The personality”, or “Thought” that is linked in some unknown, or metaphysical way, to the brain; or body.  The conscious thought that we are aware of (or unaware of as the case may be) occurs entirely in the brain.

There is no “Duality.”   Descartes was wrong. There is no separate “mind.”  There is no “Soul” that holds our personality.  As the Dalai Lama says, “When you die, YOU cease to exist.”

2) “We begin to act before we consciously decide to act.”  We don’t really have “free will,” but we do have “free won’t.”

Brain scan studies show that before we have a conscious decision to move, or act, the brain has already started processes that will facilitate this behavior.  Then we have a conscious decision to Act, or NOT Act.  If we decide to act then these processes will continue to operate in the typical way.  However, if we decide to NOT Act, all brain behavior subsides and we are generally unaware of this fact.

This is why, in my opinion, we get fatigued in crowds, or with many false alarms.  There are many triggers to behavior that we are subconsciously dismissing by exercising our “Free Won’t.”  This is a lot of work for our brain.

Conclusion


The book “Consciousness – a Very Short Introduction” by Susan Blackmore is highly recommended.  Succinct and readable, it challenges the mind with ideas about mind in a thoughtful and enjoyable manner.






copyright(c)2015
William Schaeffer

Saturday, April 11, 2015

Book Review: "The Blank Slate" by Stephen Pinker



Book Review: “The Blank Slate” by Stephen Pinker

This book is a well written survey of what is currently known about “Brain Science” and personality.  Written for the layman, it is very readable and presents a good overview of the different areas of current research.   Although accused of “superficiality” I find it was a good introduction for me to the current state of research.

There were two main conclusions that I found fascinating and important:


1) Your basic personality is inborn.  You are born with your personality already formed and your environment has little effect on your basic personality of likes, dislikes, and your own personal set of interests and behavior.


THIS IS THE ANSWER TO THE NATURE VERSUS NURTURE QUESTION.  Your personality is inborn and not created by your upbringing.  Your parents have very little influence on “who you are.”

How they proved this was genius.  Using the Briggs Meyer personality profile which yields a quantitative measure of personality on several different scales, or axis, of interest, researchers studied two different groups of adults.
A. In identical twins separated at birth, they found a much greater than average similarity of personality as adults.  Even though the twins had no environmental conditions the same during childhood, they had personalities that were statistically very similar.
B. In children adopted at birth and raised in the same home, they found no more similarity in personality as adults than total strangers.
The interpretation of these results is that the home environment had little real effect on the resulting personality of the adult.  In other words, NATURE is everything and NURTURE has little effect.
C. Using studies of immigrant children and language acquisition, they found that the environment of the “peer group” has some effect (5%) on the formation of personality as we are influenced by the personalities of our childhood friends.  But, the influence of parents on the resultant child’s personality is negligible (except for the genetic contribution of DNA).



2) Your political orientation is inborn.  You were born being either a Republican or Democrat, (Conservative or Liberal) and your life experience has little effect on your political decisions. 


They found that people tend to be “Novelty Seeking” or “Familiarity Seeking” when they are born.  “Novelty Seeking” children experience arousal of the sympathetic nervous system when they encounter new and unique environments or situations.  They seek the new and different.  “Familiarity Seeking” children have arousal of their sympathetic nervous system when they experience familiar surroundings and events.  These children like the predictable and known.  

This personality characteristic is constant through life for all people.

Therefore, Democrats tend to be “Novelty Seeking” adults that constantly want to improve the system.  In other words, their philosophy might be, “Let’s try something different and see if we can make it better.”   Republicans, on the other hand, tend to be “Familiarity Seeking” adults that think “It has worked well so far and we do not want to change anything,” or “Let’s keep the social system the way it was because we know how that works.”

Given this understanding, it is easy to see why our Democratic, or parliamentarian, form of Government seems to be at an impasse and not functional in today’s world.   That is because it is not functional.  The Conservatives and Liberals are not having the same discussion.  They do not have the same goals.  Their appeals to their opponents always fall on deaf ears, because their opponents do not share the same desires or motivations.

Political discussions rarely look at the underlying value systems and instead argue specifics without acknowledging this fundamental difference.  Parliamentary debate seems to be an exercise in futility because it does not address the underlying difference of intent of the participants.



In conclusion, this book “The Blank Slate” by Stephen Pinker is a fascinating book.  This review barely touches the surface and the book is filled with interesting facts, stories and conclusions.  If you have any interest in mind, behavior, and personality, you will want to read this book.


~

Copyright©2015
William Schaeffer

Friday, April 3, 2015

Absolute Truth




"Logic and Math are the only paths to absolute truth." - Mr Atwater




copyright(c)2015
William Schaeffer

Thursday, April 2, 2015

Three books on Jesus and Christianity




From a Letter to a friend:


1. If you want a challenging book to read I suggest "James the Brother of Jesus: The Key to Unlocking the Secrets of Early Christianity and the Dead Sea Scrolls" by Robert H. Eisenman.  1000 pages of historical analysis of rare texts and scholarship.   Dense and overwhelming, yet riveting and probably true.. 

 I got Bronchitis about 8 years ago was deathly ill for three weeks.  I lain on my couch and read the entire book.

Thesis: James was the first leader of the Early Christian church which was Ebionite Jewish Christian.   Apostle Paul was an "apostate" that introduced a different form of "Pauline Christianity" to appeal to Gentiles.   There was violent confrontation between the two people and groups instigated by Paul.

Eventually, "Pauline Christianity" became the dominant form of philosophical interpretation (as expressed by the Bible we read today) and James became largely removed from the bible story (except the Book attributed to him).   

This would explain why the gospels and books of the bible are written in Greek, when Jesus and his followers spoke Aramaic.

2. According to Eisenman, all these events were obscured by the Jewish Wars against Rome in 66-70 CE and 126-130 CE.  In the second war, every tree in Israel was cut down and every book was burned.  Jerusalem was destroyed and no one was allowed to live there for 100 years.

Before the first revolt in 66 CE, the Jewish Christians left Jerusalem and migrated to Syria where they and their descendants lived until their form of Christianity was declared a Heresy 200 - 300 years later.   Many of their descendants were burned alive in their Churches by forces loyal to Rome.  Their primary text was called the Gospel of the Hebrews and no copies have survived to this day.  It was written in Aramaic and was similar to the Gospel of  Mathew with no Virgin Birth story.

Apparently Roman soldiers followed the group to Syria in 80 AD (or so) and killed all the members of Jesus's immediate family.  This was because Jesus claimed to be King of the Jews (which was capital offense crime against Rome).  This is when Jude died.  Thomas escaped and went to India where he is reputed to have founded a Church that exists to this day.

Jesus was not from Nazareth.  Nazareth, as a city, did not exist until around 200 AD. Most likely Jesus took a Nazerite vow, which was the same vow that Samson took to avoid linen, wine, and to keep his hair and beard long and not cut.  This would explain why Jesus is pictured with long hair.



3. Apparently the doctrine and practices of the Christian Church today are more similar to the Hellenistic Mystery schools than they are to the original practices and beliefs of the original Ebionite Jewish Christians.

There is a book called "The Christ Conspiracy - The Greatest Story Ever Sold" by Acharya S. that details the similarities of the Christian mythology with 19 other (and pre-existing) stories of humans that obtained divinity and were born again  (Osiris, Mithras, Krishna, Dionysus, Sol Invictus, are just a few).  It is astounding how similar all the stories are with a virgin birth, youthful insight, miracle working, magical signs, death and resurrection.


4. Another book called "You will not Taste Death – Jesus and Epicureanism" by Jack W. Hanna, details the similarity of Jesus philosophy to that of the Greek philosophical school of the Epicureans.  The Epicureans lived "outside of society" and had disdain for all common social conventions and norms, frequently living as beggars and making obnoxious commentary on current events.

He uses the Gospel of Thomas as reference and also does an amazing job of analyzing the last days of Jesus using the sequence of sayings in the text as a reference.   The Gospel of Thomas is a fascinating non-canonical work found at Nag Hammadi.   Possibly the most original text of all, it just consists of a collection of sayings.   About a third of the sayings are identical with the New Testament Gospel sayings.   The rest are more metaphysical in nature like Zen Buddhist Koans.


5. In conclusion, it seems to me that the fundamental concept in contemporary Christianity of "Salvation through Faith" is not what the original Ebionite Christians understood the message of Jesus to be.

To them, a spiritual life was "the practice;" which was an austere communal non-materialistic vegetarian lifestyle of philosophical contemplation, spiritual cleanliness, and prayer.   They believed that "faith follows practice," or   "enough practice will form the correct mind to develop true belief and deep understanding."

In contrast, you might say that Apostle Paul preached a doctrine of "faith inspires practice," or "desire for spiritual practice and lifestyle is a natural result of the understanding that is awakened by the faith shown in professing true belief."

There is a substantial philosophical difference between those two traditions. 


6) Curious facts: The followers of John the Baptist exist to this day; originally surviving in Iraq and recently migrated to Australia.   Called Mandeans, they have a Gnostic worldview and consider John the Baptist to be the prophet.

Most likely John the Baptist ate biscuits and honey.  The Aramaic word for biscuit being very similar to locust.  This was probably mis-translated to locusts to discredit The Baptist among early Christians.


7) Around 200CE the prophet Mani was born in Persia.  He claimed he was born to correct some teachings of Jesus.  Like Jesus he performed miracles, healed the sick and raised the dead.  Unlike Jesus, he wrote his own scriptures.  At one time his religion of Manicheism stretched from China to Rome and had more followers than the Roman Catholic Church..  In 1200AD the largest temple in the capital city of China was a Manichean Temple.  Saint Augustine was a follower of Mani for almost ten years before he converted to Christianity and later became its greatest theologian.



April 2, 2015
William A Schaeffer





copyright(c)2015
William Schaeffer